Saturday, June 9, 2012

Will Jesus Return? For What?

by Dr. Aslam Abdullah

There is a statement attributed to Prophet Muhammad by Jabir ibn 'Abdullah: "He who denies the appearance of the Mahdi is inevitably blaspheming against what was revealed to the Prophet. He who denies the appearance of Jesus, the son of Mary has become an unbeliever. Someone who denies that the Antichrist will appear is also inevitably an unbeliever." This statement is also reported in Muhammad Parisa's Fusul-i Sitta, Ibn Ishaq's Kitab al-Ta`aruf li Madhhab Ahl al-Tasawwuf, Imam Suhayli's al-Rawd al-Unuf, and Imam Suyuti's Alamat al-Mahdi. 

Based on these reports, the website http://al-shia.org/html/eng/history/others/01/11.htm  concludes: “Given this, Islamic scholars regard belief in Jesus' second coming and his causing true religious moral values to prevail as major articles of faith.” There are many other scholars from Sunni, Shias, Zaydis, Ibadi sects who consider the idea of the second coming of Jesus as part of Iman.  

The Quran described faith or Iman differently as it focuses on five fixed articles. “It is not righteousness that ye turn your faces towards east or West, but it is righteousness- to believe in Allah and the Last Day, and the Angels, and the Book, and the Messengers.” (2:177). The Quran does not make the acceptance of Mahdi or the second coming Jesus as articles of faith. Iman(Faith) is defined by none other than Allah and even a prophet is not given the permission to edit the articles of faith as defined by Allah. It is He alone who has the prerogative to define Iman. Addressing the Prophet, Allah says:   “And thus, too, [O Muhammad,] have We revealed unto you a life-giving message, [coming] at Our behest. [Before this message came unto you,] you did not know what revelation is, or what faith [implies]: but [now] We have caused this [message] to be a light, whereby We guide whom We will of Our ser­vants: and, verily [on the strength thereof] you, too, shall guide [men] onto the straightway. The way that leads to God, to whom all that is in the heavens and all that is on earth belongs. Oh, verily with God is the beginning and the end of all things!” (42:52-53) Obviously, mattes of Iman are not left to speculations and the Quran has specified them clearly.

However, with such a strong statement about the Mahdi and the second coming of Jesus attributed to Prophet Muhammad and reported by so many scholars of Islam, who could dare to question the second coming of Jesus. Yet at the risk of being called unbelievers or deniers of some ahadith on the second coming of Jesus, many Muslim scholars have either challenged the idea of the physical ascension of Prophet Jesus to heaven throughout Islam’s intellectual history or cast doubts on the reports related to the second coming of Jesus.
Mahmud Shaltut, the former Mufti of Egypt and ex-Rector of the world-famous al-Azhar University, Cairo was one of them. He wrote: “There is no authority in the Quran or the Sunna which can satisfy the heart upon the belief that Jesus was taken up to heaven with his body and that he is still alive there and that he shall descend therefrom to earth in the last days.” (Al-Fatāwā, published by Al-Idara al-‘Ama lil-Saqafat al-Islamiyya bil-Azhar, pp. 52-58)
“The Quranic verses in this connection indicate that Allah had promised Jesus that He would cause him to die at the appointed time, and elevate him to Himself, and protect him from the disbelievers. This promise has been fulfilled. His enemies could not kill him or crucify him; instead, Allah caused him to die at the end of his appointed term and elevated him to Himself.” (Ibid.)
How should a lay Muslim look at this issue? Should he/she consider the second coming of Jesus as part of faith or should he/she consider it mere speculation or wishful thinking built around the Christian concept of the return of Jesus?
The issue has created a body of Islamic literature that lead a great majority of Muslims to believe that change would ultimately come in our world when Prophet Jesus would reappear. What is often ignored in this literature is a reference to the Quranic message that "Because Allah will never change the grace which He has bestowed on a people until they change what is in their (own) souls: and verily Allah is He Who hears and knows (all things).” (8:53) or “Verily never will Allah change the condition of a people until they change it themselves (with their own souls)” (13:11)
The popular view among Muslim scholars on Jesus is as follows: When Jews were about to crucify Jesus Allah took him up to heaven alive in his physical body, and he is alive there. He will descend at the age of forty and will fulfill the responsibilities of the prophet (some scholars believe that he will be removed from the rank of Prophethood). His mission will be to kill the pig, break the cross and abolish the jizya, initiating a worldwide reformation that would create absolute peace.   
If only the return of Jesus would bring about the desired change in the society, then why should any be bothered about changing the world and until his return we should not even focus on the above-mentioned verses of the Quran commanding us to work toward changing our conditions on our own.
Many Muslim scholars have challenged this idea of the return of Jesus on the basis of their understanding of the Quran and the sayings of the Prophet. Their an alternative perspective is often ignored or dismissed by those who believe in the popular version.

The Quranic Perspective on Death

No one is immortal except Allah. The Quran repeats the eternal law of evolution and life and death for everything and every being created by Allah. No one is an exception. Not even Jesus, because if this was the case, Allah would have definitely mentioned in the Quran.
The Quran reminds Prophet Muhammad and through him the humanity at large that every one that came before he left this world and died. The Quran emphasizes that none of the prophets that preceded Prophet Muhammad were alive.
“Therein (i.e. On the earth or physical world) shall you live, and therein shall you die, and therefrom shall you be raised.” (7:25)
“And there is for you in the earth an abode and a provision.” (7: 4)
“Have We not make the earth draw to itself the living and the dead?” (77: 25, 26)
“From it (i.e. the earth) We created you, and into it We shall return you, and from it raise you a second time.” (20:55)
“Say: Glory to my Lord! Am I anything but a mortal messenger?” (17:93)
“Muhammad is not the father of any man from among you, but he is the Messenger of Allah and the one to end the prophets.” (33:40)
“We did not send before you (O Muhammad) any messenger, but they surely ate food.” (25:20)
“We did not give them (i.e. The prophets) bodies not eating food.” (21:8)
“And We granted abiding forever to no mortal before you (O Muhammad). If you die, will they abide” (21:34).
“They (i.e. The prophets) did not abide forever.” (21:8).
“Allah is He Who created you from a state of weakness, and then gave you strength after weakness, then ordained weakness and hoary hair after strength.”(30:54)
“Of you is he who is brought back to the worst part of life (i.e. old age) so that after knowledge he knows nothing.” (22:5)
“And whomsoever We cause to live long, We reduce to an abject state in creation. Do they not understand?” (36:68)
“The Messiah, son of Mary, was only a messenger; messengers before him had indeed passed away.” (5:75)
“And Muhammad is only a messenger — messengers have already passed away before him. If, then, he dies or is killed, will you turn back upon your heels?” (3:143)
“Those are a people that have passed away.” (2:134)
“…before which other nations have passed away.” (13:30)
“…among nations that have passed away before them.” (46:18)
“Such has been the way of Allah with those who have passed away before.” (33:38)
“And those whom they call on besides Allah created nothing, while they are themselves created. Dead (are they), not living. And they know not when they will be raised.” (16:20-21)
Certainly they disbelieve who say: ‘Allah, He is the Messiah, son of Mary’.” (5:72)
Jesus said: I am a servant of Allah: He has given me the Book and made me a prophet, and made me blessed wherever I maybe.” (19:30-31)
“O Jesus, I will cause you to die, and exalt you to My presence, and clear you of those who disbelieve and make those who follow you above those who disbelieve till the Day of Judgment.” (3:55)
They charged Mary with a grave calumny. They boasted that they had murdered Jesus, son of Mary, Rasool of Allah; although the fact is that they neither murdered him nor crucified him. What they took for reality was merely something which appeared to them as such. On the other hand, those who differ from Jews (i.e. Christians) are also in doubt about the matter. Their knowledge is no more than a surmise. It is certain that they (i.e. Jews) did not murder Jesus. The Jews say that by crucifying him they had inflicted a degrading death upon him. Allah has raised Jesus very high in His ranks. He had power enough to protect Jesus from his enemies and He did so with great sagacity The Christians are so firm in their belief that each one confesses before his death that Jesus was crucified and atoned for their sins. On the Day of Reckoning, Jesus himself will bear witness against them (4:156-159)
And when Allah will say: ‘O Jesus, did you say to men, Take me and my mother for two gods besides Allah?’ He will reply: ‘Glory be to You! It was not for me to say what I had no right to say. If I had said it, You would indeed have known it. You know what is in my mind, and I know not what is in Your mind. Surely, You are the great Knower of the unseen. I said to them naught save as You did command me: Serve Allah, my Lord, and your Lord; and I was a witness of them so long as I was among them, but when you did cause me to die You were the Watcher over them. And You are Witness of all things’.” (5:116,117)
Thus the Quranic verdict about Jesus is very clear. He is a mortal from among mortals. He is a prophet of Allah from among the prophets. Some people worship him as a deity. He is not alive and he was not raised in physical form. Rather, Allah explained that those who wanted to inflict a humiliating death upon him failed in their attempts as Jesus was granted a higher rank.
The Quran used a similar expression about Prophet Idrees.
Also (O Rasool!), mentioned in this Book is the story of Idrees.  He too was a very truthful person; and a Nabi. And We had exalted him to a high position (19:56-57)). Moreover, addressing the Prophet, the Quran further explained the issue of mortality. “We have not made before you (O Muhammad) any mortal to abide forever. If you die, will they (the opponents) abide?” (21:34) “Dead (are they), not living. And they know not when they will be raised.” (16:21)
Prophet’s Statements on the death of Jesus
There are several statements attributed to Prophet Muhammad where the death of Prophet Jesus was asserted.
“It is reported from Ibn Abbas that the Holy Prophet said in a sermon: O people! You will be gathered to your Lord (on the Day of Judgment) … and some people from my Umma will be taken and dragged towards hell. I shall say: ‘O Lord, but these are my people’. It will be replied: ‘You do not know what they did after you’. Then I shall say as did that righteous servant of Allah (i.e., Jesus) say: ‘I was a witness of them so long as I was among them, but when You did cause me to die You were the Watcher over them’ …” (Bukhari, Kitab al-Tafsir, under Surah Ma’idah.)
The Prophet said that during the ascension to heaven he saw “Adam is in the first heaven … Joseph is in the second heaven, and his cousins Yahya (John the Baptist) and Jesus are in the third heaven, and Idris is in the fourth heaven.” (Kanz al-‘Ummāl, vol. vi, p. 120
“Then the Holy Prophet descended on Jerusalem, along with all the other prophets. At the time of prayers, he led them all in prayer.” (Tafsir Ibn Kathir, Urdu ed., vol. iii, p. 23)
The Prophet said: “O people! I have heard that you fear the death of your Prophet. Did any prophet before me live on so that I should be expected to live on amongst you? Listen! I am about to meet my Lord, and so will you. So I bid you  treat well the early muhajirs.” (Al-anwār-ul-Muhammadiyya min al-Muwāhib al- Ladinya, Egypt, p. 317)
The Prophet said, “There is no one alive today, but will be dead before a hundred years have passed over it.” (Muslim, Kitab al- Faza’il; Kanz al-‘Ummāl, vol. 7, p. 170)
“Ayesha, the mother of the believers said that, in his illness in which he died, the Holy Prophet said: ‘Every year Gabriel used to repeat the Holy Quran with me once, but this year he has done it twice. He has informed me that there is no prophet, but he lives half as long as the one who preceded him. And he has told me that Jesus lived a hundred and twenty years, and I see that I am about to leave this world at sixty’.” (Hujjaj al-Kirāmah, p. 428; Kanz al-‘Ummāl, vol. 6, p.160, from Fatima; and Mawāhib al-Ladinya, vol. 1, p. 42)
The Prophet Muhammad said: “Had Moses or Jesus been alive, they would have had to follow me.” (Al-Yawaqit wal-Jawahir, p. 24; Fath al-Bayan, vol. 2, p. 246; Tafsir Ibn Kathir, under verse 81 of Al-i Imran)
“Had Jesus been alive he would have had to follow me.” (Sharh Fiqh Akbar, Egyptian ed., p. 99)
The Prophet said: “May the curse of Allah be upon the Jews and the Christians who made the graves of their prophets into places of worship.” (Bukhari, Kitab as-Salat, chapter: ‘Should the graves of the idolaters of the Jahiliyya be dug up and mosques take their place?’)

Statements of the Companions of the Prophet on the death of Jesus
The first Caliph Abu Bakr said the following in his speech:
‘I would give my father for you, O Prophet of Allah; Allah would never give you two deaths and you have died of the death that Allah had ordained for you.’
Abu Salmah says: Ibn Abbas told me that Abu Bakr came out, and Umar was talking to the people. He told him to sit down, but he refused. He told him again, and he still refused. Abu Bakr then recited the Kalima Shahada, and the people turned their attention to him, leaving Umar.” (Bukhari, Kitab al-Jana’iz, chapter 3; Kitab al- Maghazi, chapter: ‘Illness of the Holy Prophet’) Caliph Abu Bakr then announced: “Whoever among you worships Muhammad, Muhammad has indeed died; but whoever worships Allah, Allah lives on forever, never dies. Allah says: ‘Muhammad is only a messenger; messengers before him have indeed passed away...’ (the Quran, 3:144).” (Bukhari, reference as above.)
In Sahih Bukhari it is recorded:
“By Allah, it was as if the people did not know that Allah had revealed this verse until Abu Bakr recited it. Then (it was as if) the people had learned it from him, and whomever one heard, he was reciting this verse (i.e. ‘Muhammad is only a messenger; messengers before him have indeed passed away...’)” (Bukhari, reference as above.)
The second Caliph Umar related:
“I was so shocked that my feet could not support me and I fell to the ground when I heard him recite it (i.e. the verse) that the Holy Prophet had indeed died.” (Bukhari, Kitab al-Maghazi, chapter cited above.). Companions agreed on death, of all prophets. Caliph Umar’s contention that the Prophet had only gone to visit the Lord, and would be returning, was refuted by Caliph Abu Bakr, proving that all previous prophets had died — and consequently also the Holy Prophet. Had Caliph Umar or any other companion believed that Jesus was alive in heaven, he would certainly have spoken out against Abu Bakr’s reference of the verse that all previous prophets were dead. This shows that none of the companions even imagined that Prophet Jesus or any other prophet was still alive and had not died.
Caliph Abu Bakr Siddiq, Allah be pleased with him, said: “Where is Moses, where is Jesus, where is Yahya, where is Noah, [i.e., they have all died], So you, O sinner Siddiq, repent to your Glorious Lord.”
Caliph Ali, Allah be pleased with him, said: “Death spares not the father, nor the son; it is the path that cares not for anyone. He (the Prophet) was a prophet, yet he did not remain with his Umma forever, Had anyone before he lived forever, he (Prophet) too would have lived forever.”
The mother of the believer, Ayesha relates from the Prophet Muhammad:
“Jesus, son of Mary lived to the age of 120 years.” (Hujjaj al-Kirāmah, p. 428)
The daughter of the Prophet Fatima relates from the Prophet: “Jesus, son of Mary lived to the age of 120 years.” (Kanz al-‘Ummāl, vol. vi, p. 120)
The grandson of the Prophet, Hasan ascended the pulpit after the martyrdom of Caliph Ali and said: “O people! This night there has died a man whose status cannot be reached by the earlier or later generations. The Messenger of Allah used to send him to battle, so on his right would be Gabriel and on his left Michael and he would not return without victory. He died on the night on which the soul of Jesus, son of Mary, was taken up, that is the twenty-seventh of Ramadan.” (Tabaqat Kabir, vol. iii, p. 26)
Explaining the Quranic verse, “O Jesus, I will cause you to die, Ibn Abbas is recorded as saying: “mutawaffī-ka means ‘I will cause you to die (mumītu-ka)’.” (Bukhari, Kitab al-Tafsir, on verse 5:110).
“In the Mustadrak (a Hadith collection) it is reported from Ibn Umar that Jesus lived to the age of 120 years. It is likewise also in the Asābah.” (Tafsir Kamalain).
The companion-poet Hasan Ibn Thabit sang: “If any people of the world could exist forever, certainly, the Messenger of Allah would have lived forever in it.” “You (O Prophet) were the pupil of my eye, with your death my eye lost its sight, whoever remains after you, let him die since I was afraid only of your passing.”
Imam Mālik, one of the four imams of jurisprudence believed that Jesus had died.:
“While most people believe that Jesus did not die, Mālik said that he died.” (Majma‘ Bih_ār al-Anwār, vol. i, p. 286) “In the ‘Utbiyya it is written that Mālik said that Jesus, son of Mary, died.” (Ikmāl al-ikmāl, Commentary of Muslim, vol. i, p. 265)
Imam Ibn Hazm wrote: “Jesus, peace be upon him, was neither killed nor crucified, but Allah caused him to die and then raised him. The Almighty has said: ‘They did not kill him or crucify him’; and ‘I will cause you to die and exalt you’; and ‘I (Jesus) was a witness of them so long as I was among them, but when You did cause me to die. You were the Watcher over them’ and ‘Allah takes the souls at the time of death’. Thus, there are two kinds of wafāt: sleep and death. Jesus in his words ‘When You did cause me to die was not referring to sleep, but it is correct that by wafāt he meant death.” (Mahalli fil-Fiqh, p. 23)

Earlier Scholars of Islam 
 “Imam Ibn Hazm adopted the apparent significance of the verse, and believed in his (Jesus’) death.” (Jalālain, under verse 3:55)
Abul Hasan Ali Hajwairi (Data Ganj Bakhsh) writes:
“The Messenger of Allah said that, on the night of the Mi‘raj, he saw Adam, Joseph, Moses, Aaron, Jesus and Abraham, in the heavens. Assuredly it was their souls.”
(Kashf al-Mah_jūb, Chapter al-Kalām fir-rūh, p. 204).
Shaikh al-Akbar Muhayy-ud-Din Ibn Arabi in his Quranic commentary writes:
“The raising (raf‘) of Jesus means that, at the time of separation, his soul was raised from the lower world to the higher world. And his being in the fourth heaven signifies that the source of his soul’s benefit is the spirituality of that sun’s sky, which resembles the heart of the world, and towards that is his place of return. That spirituality is a light which illumines that heaven with its love, and the shining of the rays upon his soul is done by its stimulation. And as Jesus’ place of return is towards its real place of rest, and cannot attain its true development, his (Jesus’) descent in the latter days will be in a different body.” (Commentary upon verse ‘Allah raised him to Himself’, p. 65)
Taqi-ud-Din Abul-Abbas Ahmad ibn Abdul Hakim ibn Abdus-Salam, known as Imam Ibn Taimiyya, writes:
“Allah has informed, in regard to the Messiah, that he told people only to worship Allah, ‘my Lord and your Lord’; and he was a witness of them so long as he was among them, but after his death (wafāt) only Allah was the Watcher over them. So if some people have misreported him, or misinterpreted his words, or deliberately altered the religion he brought, the Messiah cannot be held responsible for it, for he was only a messenger whose duty was just the delivery of the message.” (Al-Jawwāb as-S_ah_īh_ li-man baddala dīn al-Masīh, vol. ii, p. 280)
Hafiz Ibn Qayyim Shams-ud-Din Abu Abdullah Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, known as wrote: “As for what is related about the Messiah that he was raised up to heaven at the age of 33 years, there is no sound authority for this which one could turn to.” (Zād al-Ma‘ād, vol. i, p. 20) And: “With the exception of the Holy Prophet Muhammad, a person attains to heaven with his spirit only after death and separation from the body, so the spirits of all prophets went to heaven only after death and separation from the body.” (ibid., p. 304)
Allama Jubā’I He said: “The verse shows that Allah caused Jesus to die (amāta) and brought about his death (tawaffā-hu), and then raised him to Himself.” (Commentary Majma‘ al-Bayān, vol. I, under verse falammā tawaffaita-nī)
Imam Asir-ud-Din Muhammad ibn Yusuf ibn Ali al-Andalasi, known as Abu Hayyan Nahwi, writes: “This verse shows that Allah made Jesus die (tawaffāhu wafāt al-maut) before raising him.” (Bah_r al-Muh_īt_, vol. iv, p. 4)
Imam Muhammad ibn Ali ibn Muhammad ibn Abdullah, known as Allama Shaukani, has written: “It is said that this verse shows that Allah caused Jesus to die before raising him.” (Fath_ al-Qādir Qalmī, p. 4)
Allama Abdul Rahman Sa‘di In his Quranic commentary, writes: “Allah honored Jesus by causing his disciples to spread in the world, in his lifetime and after his death (mamāt).” (Tafsīr al-Manān, published in Makka)
Muhammad Asad in The Message of the Quran  translates verse 3:55 of the Quran in the following English words: “Lo! God said: O Jesus! Verily, I shall cause thee to die, and exalt thee unto Me.” Verse 5:117 is rendered as: “And I bore witness to what they did as long as I dwelt amongst them; but since Thou hast caused me to die, Thou alone hast been their keeper. For You are a witness unto everything”. In the footnote to verse 4:157 he explains:
“Thus the Quran categorically denies the story of the crucifixion of Jesus. There exist, among Muslims, many fanciful legends telling us that at the last moment God substituted for Jesus a person closely resembling him (according to some accounts, that person was Judas), who was subsequently crucified in his place. However, none of these legends finds the slightest support in the Quran or in authentic traditions, and the stories produced in this connection by the classical commentators of the Quran must be summarily rejected.” The next footnote contains the statement:
“Nowhere in the Quran is there any warrant for the popular belief of many Muslims that God has ‘taken up’ Jesus bodily into heaven.”
The famous Egyptian reformist Mufti Muhammad Abduh believed that Jesus had died:
“In the Tafsīr al-Manār, the teacher and Imam (Muhammad Abduh), after taking the apparent meaning of the verse, has stated that tawaffā bears its obvious significance, i.e., causing to die. The raising (raf‘) comes after that, and it is spiritual elevation.” (Qas_as_ al-Anbiyā by Abdul Wahab al-Najar, p. 428) “Tawaffā here means causing to die, as in the obvious and comprehensible significance.” (Al-Manār)
Rashid Raza, the famous disciple of Mufti Muhammad Abduh writes: “Hence Jesus’ escape to India and his death in that country is not against reason and sense.”
(Quranic Commentary by Al-Sayyid Rashid Raza, part vi, pp. 42, 43)
Dr Ahmad Zaki Abu Shadi in his article Hal al-Qur’ān Mu‘jiza (‘Is the Quran a miracle?’), he writes:
“It is a well-known teaching of Islam that Allah is everywhere, and that He is the light of heaven and the earth. So the words ‘He raised him (Jesus) to Himself ’ do not have the physical meaning that He lifted him up to heaven, as is the Christian belief. … Raf‘ here means to rescue and to honor, as opposed to a degraded death on the cross in the manner in which criminals are executed. Other interpretations that some Muslim commentators have adopted are more akin to poetry than to sound logic, and the reliability of these commentators’ scholarship is rather limited.” (Al-Mawāhib Āzār, Argentina, March 1955)
This renowned nineteenth-century Muslim educationist, social reformer, religious scholar and founder of the Aligarh Muslim University, Sir Syed Ahmad Khan wrote:
“Now we must turn to the Holy Quran to see what it says. The Quran makes mention of Jesus’ death in four places … Firstly, in Sūra Āl ‘Imrān, secondly, in Sūra Mā’ida, … thirdly, in Sūra Maryam … fourthly, in Sūra Nisā’. Jesus was not killed by the Jews, either by stoning or by crucifixion, but he died his natural death, and God raised him in rank and status … From the first three verses, it is clear that Jesus died a natural death.
However, as the Ulama of Islam had followed the Christians in accepting that Jesus had gone up to heaven alive, before looking at the Quran, so they have tried to interpret some of the words in these verses to accord with their unsound belief.” (Tafsīr Ah_madī by Sir Syed Ahmad Khan, vol. ii. Referring to the expression ‘in this’ (Arabic: bi-hi) in the verse: ‘And there is none of the People of the Book but will believe in this before his death’ (4:159), which is generally taken to mean in him (i.e. in Jesus), Sir Syed writes:
“This points to the words ‘And their saying: we have killed the Messiah’ [4:157], and to their saying, and not to the Messiah. So this means: ‘All the People of the Book, before their death, will believe that Jesus was killed’. After this it is said: ‘And on the day of Judgment he, i.e., Jesus, will be a witness against them’. The word ‘alā [‘against’] is used to indicate loss or harm. So the meaning is that on the Day of Judgment Jesus will be a witness against their belief.” (Maktūb Sir Syed, No. 2, p. 48)
“Jesus spent his early life migrating from one place to another. His later life was not very long, for he was 33 years of age when he died, and at that time there were only 70 people who believed in him.” (The Aligarh Magazine, Intikhab No. 1971, p. 48)
Maulana Ubaidullah Sindhi wrote: “Mutawaffī-ka means mumītu-ka [I will cause you to die] and what generally prevails amongst the public about Jesus’ life is a Jewish and Sabean fable … It is not a concealed matter that the source of Islam is the Quran, and in it, there is not even one verse proving explicitly that Jesus did not die, and that he is alive and shall come down. These are only the deductions and explanations of some people and are not free from doubt and uncertainty. How, then, can it be taken to be
a fundamental Islamic belief?” (Ilhām al-Rah_mān fī-tafsīr al-Qur’ān, vol. ii, p. 49)
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, one of the most prominent Islamic scholars of India expresses his view as follows:
“The death of Jesus is mentioned in the Quran itself. (Malfūzāt-i Azad, compiled by Muhammad Ajmal Khan, Maktaba Mahaul, Karachi, pp. 129, 130)
ii. “The belief [in Jesus being alive] by its nature is in every way a Christian doctrine which has appeared in an Islamic guise.” (Naqsh Azad, p. 102, compiled by Maulana Ghulam Rasul Mahr)
Dr. Sir Muhammad Iqbal writes in a poem:
“Is the son of Mary dead, or does he live? Are Divine attributes separate from God, or one with His Person? Is the Coming one the Nazarene, Jesus, or a Mujaddid having the son of Mary’s qualities? Are the Divine words created, or pre-existing from eternity, In which belief does lay the salvation of the Ummah?
Are not sufficient for the Muslims today, These Lāt and Manāt [idols] carved out by theology.” (Armaghan Hijaz, p. 227) ii. In a letter he wrote:
“I can only tell you what I believe. I consider the Hadith reports about the Mahdi, the coming Messiah, and mujaddidiyya, to be derived from Persian and non-Arab conceptions. They have no connection with Arab concepts or the true spirit of the Quran.” (Iqbal Nama, ‘Collection of the Letters of Iqbal’, Part II, letter to Chaudhary Muhammad Ahsan, p. 231)
In another poetic verse he writes:
“Look for the descent of God upon the minaret of your own heart,
And give up waiting even for the Mahdi or Jesus.” (Baqiyat Iqbal, p. 451).
 “Jamal-ud-Din Afghani, Allama Iqbal, and many other thinkers believe that no Mahdi or Messiah will now descend from heaven.” (Zamindar, Lahore, 27 July 1952)
Maulana Sayyid Sulaiman Nadawi, the great modern Muslim scholar from India wrote::
“Looking at the birth of Jesus, his death and the doctrine of Trinity, some American critics and rationalists now believe that Jesus has just been a mythical figure.” (Khutbāt Madrās, p. 42, Sermon No. 2, published by the Lahore Academy, 205 Circular Road, Lahore)
“It appears from this that even before Sir Syed [Ahmad Khan] some Ulama held the same viewpoint as his on this question [of Jesus’ death]. People today who make this issue a standard for determining belief or disbelief in Islam are indulging in extremism.” (Mu‘āraf, March 1930, p. 171)
In a letter from a high ranking Pakistan Government official, published by Maulana Abdul Majid Daryabadi in his newspaper S_idq-i-Jadīd of Lucknow (India), the following is recorded about Maulana Sayyid Sulaiman Nadwi’s view of the “descent” of Jesus: “The Maulana said: ‘I do not hold this belief myself and consider the Hadith reports about it to be unsound.’ The Maulana had disclosed this view of his to Maulana Ihtasham-ul-Haq, but had added that since to oppose this belief gives rise to much trouble, he refrained from expressing it, and also because this belief did not relate to the fundamentals of Islam.” (S_idq-i Jadīd, Lucknow, 28 October 1955)
In his famous book Tazkira, after discussing historical testimony relating to the death of Jesus, Allama Inayatullah Mashriqi, the founder of Khaksar Movement in India and a great scholar of the Quran wrote: “It is clearly proved today that the prophets were great experts in the laws of nature, and very knowledgeable in the sciences. To be so well-informed is not only true prophethood but also conveys the exemplary lesson that Jesus’ death too was according to the Divine law regarding which the Quran says: ‘You will not find any change in the law of Allah’ (Sūra Al-Fātir).” (Tazkira, vol. i, footnote, pp.16-17)
 Abdullah Yusuf Ali in the first edition of his English translation and commentary of the Holy Quran, he rendered verse 3:55 as: “I will take thy soul and raise thee to Myself.” In the footnote at this point in the first edition, he wrote: “Read this along with 4:157 where it is said that the Jews neither crucified nor killed Jesus, but that another was killed in his likeness. The guilt of the Jews remained. But Jesus completed his life and was when he died taken up to God.”
Maulana Amin Ahsan Islahi, the former deputy head of the Jama‘at-i Islami writes: “The meaning is that Muhammad (peace be upon him) too is a messenger of Allah, just as there had been many other messengers [of Allah] in the world. He too may have to face the same kind of trials and tribulations that they encountered. Just as all messengers (tamām rasūl) had had to pass through the stage of death, he too would die one day. His being a messenger [of Allah] does not mean that he would not die or cannot be killed.”
(Tadabbar Quran, vol. i, p. 287, under verse 3:144, published in Lahore, 1967)
Sayyid Abul ‘Ala Maudoodi, the founder of Jamat Islamic wrote:
“The most appropriate course of action according to the Quran is to refrain from giving further details of raf‘ jismānī (bodily ascension) and of maut (death) …
In fact, one should consider Jesus’ ascent to be an extraordinary manifestation of Divine power, and leave its exact nature in brief terms as Allah Himself has left it brief.”
(Maulana Maudoodi par i‘trāzāt kā ‘ilmī jā’iza, by Maulvi Muhammad Yusuf, Part I, p. 169)
“I think that this issue is among the mutashābihāt (unclear verses), for we cannot comprehend the exact nature of Jesus’ ascent, his staying alive somewhere, and his subsequent descent at some future date. What we have been taught about the mutashābihāt is that we should not investigate them further, but merely believe in however much has been told to us. To undertake an investigation of the mutashābihāt, and to be indifferent to the muh_kamāt (explicit verses), is clear sign of perversity.” (Letter dated 1 January 1951, ref: 760/71, Ichhra, Lahore)
In answer to a letter, Sayyid Abul ‘Ala Maudoodi had his reply written by Mr. Naeem Siddiqi as follows: “As to what I have understood from the Holy Quran regarding the death of Jesus … I have already explained it, and you can read it. As to Jesus’ second coming, I cannot put it higher than a possibility because the Quran gives no explanation of it, and the basis of firm faith cannot be laid upon Hadith. It could be that Allah may send Jesus to earth again, and if He so wishes there cannot be any bar against it. In any case, this point is not part of Islamic doctrine.” (Rukh Kardār by Chaudhary Habibullah, p. 243)
“The Quran does not explicitly state that Allah raised up Jesus, body, and soul, from earth to heaven. Nor does it clearly say that he died a natural death on earth and that only his soul was raised up. Thus, on the basis of the Quran, neither of these views can be definitely rejected or confirmed.” (Tafhīm al-Qur’ān by Maulana Maudoodi, p. 240)
Thus it is evident from the divine message, the statements of the Prophet and the opinions of serious scholars that every individual tastes and has tasted death and Jesus is not an exception. The idea of his second coming is influenced by Biblical perspectives and folklores that can be found in almost every religious traditions of the world. This idea is not part of Iman. By taking an alternative position, a person cannot be accused of renouncing his/her faith. 

Monday, June 4, 2012

Selling Islam is a good business for many in Muslim Clergy: 

by Dr. Aslam Abdullah
I could not believe what I read in a flier promoting Hajj packages sponsored by people who claim they know the Quran and Sunnah of the Prophet. I read that an imam of a mosque in Southern California would be leading a Hajj group to help people get closer to God. I read that if people wanted to offer 40 prayers in Masjid Nabvi in Medina and 40 prayers in the Kaaba in Makkah, they will have to pay $500 extra for each or $1000 extra for 80 prayers. This is an addition to other charges. This comes roughly to $12.30 per prayer. Each Raka would cost $6.15 and each prostration about $3.8. The traditions say that if anyone offers these prayers at these places, his or her previous and forthcoming sins are forgiven. What an inexpensive price to please God and to get all sins forgiven. Moreover, what an inexpensive way to ensure that one returns to God in a state of complete innocence.  The irony is that people will buy it because the imam will remind him of the virtues of spending in the cause of Allah.
Not only in California, but all over the world, we find many in our religious clergy indulging in this practice. In Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Sudan, Malaysia or Turkey, even in Egypt and Morocco, you will find people selling virtues for a reasonable price. The money is collected in the name of Allah and the giver thinks that it is being used to please Allah.
No need to speculate that the money or part of it, usually goes in the pocket of the imam or the one sponsoring these schemes. What is worst is that it is done in the name of Islam and directed by people who give sermons to people asking them to get closer to Allah. They seek donations from people to build masajid and Islamic centers. Essentially, they seek funds to finance them. The irony is that these people refuse to give any account of their income and expenses.
Muslims should ask the authorities to investigate such masajid to see where their money is coming from and where is it being spent. These people deserve to be questioned for their innovative money schemes.  Such people are criminals of Islam This is like prostituting religion, like selling Allah and his prophet and making a few extra bucks by exploiting and taking advantage of people's keen desire to get closer to God. This is exactly what the priests or rabbis at churches or synagogues or at temples used to do or still do. In fact, during the medieval time in England, the church used to charge a certain amount of different categories of sins. For instance, if someone has committed fornication, he or she would have to pay 5 shillings, if someone has lied, he or she would pay one shilling or if someone would want to make special prayers to God with the help of the priest, he or she would have to spend some 10 shillings. A church would usually post a rate card outside its gates so that people bring in the appropriate money. Instead of shillings, now the religious clergy ask for dollars and pounds. Many in the Muslim clergy resemble priests and rabbis and they use religion for their personal glorification or fortune. Obviously, they do not fear God, no matter what they say. But if they are exposed and lose the privileges they have, they might start fearing people.  
The following Quranic verses clearly define these people and clearly condemns their practice of selling their faith.:

2:79 Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then says:"This is from Allah," to traffic with it for a miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby.

   
2:16 These are they who have bartered Guidance for error: But their traffic is profitless, and they have lost true direction,


    
2:174 Those who conceal Allah's revelations in the Book, and purchase for them a miserable profit,- they swallow into themselves naught but Fire; Allah will not address them on the Day of Resurrection. Nor purify them: Grievous will be their penalty.

   
2:175 They are the ones who buy Error in place of Guidance and Torment in place of Forgiveness. Ah! What boldness (They show) for the Fire!

2:86 These are the people who buy the life of this world at the price of the Hereafter: their penalty shall not be lightened nor shall they be helped.

2:90 Miserable is the price for which they have sold their souls, in that they deny (the revelation) which Allah has sent down, in insolent envy that Allah of His Grace should send it to any of His servants He pleases: Thus have they drawn on themselves Wrath upon Wrath. And humiliating is the punishment of those who reject Faith.

3:77 As for those who sell the faith they owe to Allah and their own plighted word for a small price, they shall have no portion in the Hereafter: Nor will Allah (Deign to) speak to them or look at them on the Day of Judgment, nor will He cleans them (of sin): They shall have a grievous penalty.

3:177 Those who purchase Unbelief at the price of faith,- not the least harm will they do to Allah, but they will have a grievous punishment.

 
3:187 And remember Allah took a covenant from the People of the Book, to make it known and clear to mankind, and not to hide it; but they threw it away behind their backs, and purchased with it some miserable gain! And vile was the bargain they made!

3:199 And there are, certainly, among the People of the Book, those who believe in Allah, in the revelation to you, and in the revelation to them, bowing in humility to Allah. They will not sell the Signs of Allah for a miserable gain! For them is a reward with their Lord, and Allah is swift in account.

4:44 Hast thou not turned Thy vision to those who were given a portion of the Book? They traffic in error, and wish that ye should lose the right path.

9:111 Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Qur'an: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah. Then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme. 

12:21 The man in Egypt, who bought him, said to his wife: "Make his stay (among us) honorable: may be he will bring us much good, or we shall adopt him as a son." Thus did We establish Joseph in the land, that We might teach him the interpretation of stories (and events). And Allah hath full power and control over His affairs; but most among mankind know it not.

31:6 But there are, among men, those who purchase idle tales, without knowledge (or meaning), to mislead (men) from the Path of Allah and throw ridicule (on the Path): for such there will be a Humiliating Penalty.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Why do people, including Muslims, do not really care for Syria?

by Dr. Aslam Abdullah
Why do people, including Muslims do not really care for Syria? Did they really care for fellow Muslims in Kashmir, Gujarat, Bangladesh, Bosnia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, China, Kosovo, or any other place in the world?
The most we did was to take a few dollars out of our deep or shallow pockets when we found the stench of dead bodies reached our nostrils and became unbearable. Once the dead bodies were out of our eyesight, we went back to our world and those who had suffered and still alive were forgotten. The presence of over 42 million displaced people all over the world is a living testimony of our indifference.
Why?
We tend to be divided into nations and nationalism has become our deity. Within a nation, we are divided into ethnicities and ethnicity has become our deity. We are divided into regions, races, religions, castes into clans, into classes and into parties, oligarchy, and cliques. We become concerned only when someone like us or of us suffers. For the rest, our level of sympathies depends on the volume and the style of killing. Look at the level of our sympathy for the people of Bangladesh, Bosnia, Gujarat or Iraq, Palestine or Syria and evaluate our own attitude. Syrians are the most vocal for Syrians the same way Kashmiris or Gujaratis were most vocal for their folks. We are not born with divisive nationalism. But we are taught that. We are taught that our clan, our tribe, our family, our status, our country, our nation, our religion and our ethnicity are superior or better of all. Why should we bother for those who are less than us? Is this not the logical conclusion of our upbringing?

Now the cries are coming from Syria, of women, children and disabled; cries of girls raped, elderly maimed and brutalized, and cries of children whose parents were killed in front of their own eyes. Disfigured rotting dead bodies, which could not find the grave and shrouds, offer living testimony of the inhumanity of humans to their fellows in the name of politics, security, stability, power, and whatnot.
Similar cries have been heard all over the world from time to time. Sometimes, we heard them in Germany, Bosnia, Tatarstan, and Bangladesh, and sometimes we heard them in Gujarat, Afghanistan, Iraq, Korea, Vietnam, Haiti, Brazil, Mexico, China, Uganda, Somalia, and almost everywhere in the world.
Our response is and was simple. From our masajid, we are and were told to make prayers (dua) to God to help them out of the situation. But God has never listened to these prayers in human history. He did not respond to the prayers for those in Spain, who were killed by Christians conducting inquisition. God did not respond to Jews who were tortured to death in Germany by Christian Hitler and his Nazi party. God did not listen to the prayers of Muslims in the Soviet Union, China, and Albania or in Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan or in Gujarat. God did not listen to the prayers of Muslims for the victims of rape in Bosnia. Nor did he save thousands and thousands butchered by Orthodox Christians in Bosnia. God does not respond to the continued sufferings of Palestinians who for the last 60 years have been forced to live a life of humiliation an indignity.
Our conclusion to all this continued violence against the creation of God is and was also very simple. God does not listen to our prayers because we do not pray properly, our women do not wear hijab properly, our children do not wear a proper dress, we do not read the Quran properly and our actions are not in line with the divine teachings. God is punishing us, we pronounce this judgment after every calamity, man-made or nature created.
Thus the killings go on, rapists roam the streets, bombs destroy homes and death occupies the streets and we Muslims keep on reminding ourselves to pray more, dress more modestly and live simply.
But this formula is not working. It will never work because the method that we are adopting to get the divine help is not what God recommended or commanded to us.
The divine formula is simple and straight forward.
“And why should you not fight in the cause of Allah and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)? Men, women, and children, whose cry is: "Our Lord! Rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from You one who will protect, and raise for us from You one who will help!” (The Quran: 4:75)
Muslims have refused to follow this simple divine formula. Bringing down the oppressor, the dictator, his armies, his forces, his resources would cause the collapse of his regime. Even without fighting, this could happen. When the world and the Muslim world would refuse to cooperate with dictators, would seize their bank accounts, would stop delivery of arms and material and technology to manufacture arms, would isolate the regime and would announce that their forces would act in defense of people and protect innocent lives, then only we would see an end to this violence, then only we would see the divine response to our prayers.. Only then our prayers would be answered because this is the only way God has listened to the prayers throughout human history. “(Such was) the practice (approved) of Allah among those who lived aforetime: No change will you find in the practice (approved) of Allah.” (The Quran: 32:62)
Today, in the case of Syria, we are a divided people. There are those amongst us Muslims who are supportive of the dictators, especially the oppressors in Syria for whatever reason. Those supporters of Syrian dictator are not concerned about human life or sufferings. They are concerned about the balance of power in the region, about the Shia-Sunni divide, about the impact of regime change in relations to world politics. They do not care about justice or the rule of law or the divine commandments to save human life.
 If the Muslim world really wants to stop the killings in Syria or in other places of the world, it will have to destroy the bane of nationalism and then act in unison to defend life and dignity of human beings. “On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone slew a person - unless it be for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew the whole people: and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of the whole people. Then although there came to them Our apostles with clear signs, yet, even after that, many of them continued to commit excesses in the land.” (The Quran: 5:32)

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Racism among Muslims

Of course, we are equal and no one is superior to the other. This is what we teach our kids and this is what we learn from our parents and scholars. But are we really equal? There are gender, class and status biases that exist in almost every walk of life in a Muslim community.  Even when people convert to Islam, you can notice that. There are louder shouts for a white man or woman than for a black or Hispanic man or woman.
Racism is rampant among people of all ethnicities. Among the south Asians, people claiming to be of north Indian origin seem to look down upon people of other regions. Those who are of fairer skins feel they are better. Those who claim to belong to the lineage of Abu Bakr Siddiqi, Umar bin Khattab, Uthman bin Affan or Ali Ibn Talib as well those who call them Syeds declare them superiors to others. The way people of lower castes are treated in the area is totally un-Islamic, yet this has been going on for centuries.
The racism that exists in religious circles is even worst. Even though the clergy, by and large, tend to be arrogant in general, a good number of Arabs have the notion that they are superior to non-Arabs because their language is the language of paradise or the Quran was revealed in their language or the Prophet was from the tribe of Quraysh. Even though this attitude is contrary to the universal teachings of Islam, yet this is commonly observed even in the United States.
I distinctly remember a few unforgettable incidents that I personally experienced. Once, I was asked to lead the Maghrib prayer in a gathering of Muslims. An Arab brother came forward and in front of everyone asked me to repeat the kalima and recite Sura Fatiha. I was shocked. I stepped back and asked him to lead the prayer. The irony was that he forgot to recite Sura Fatiha correctly. This was nothing pure bigotry and racism. Similarly, in a mosque, where I had just concluded giving the Friday sermon which was more in Arabic than in English, one of the Arab brothers asked me to step aside so that an Arab can lead the prayer. His argument was very simple. Only Arabs are qualified to lead the prayer. These are not isolated incidents. I see this arrogance in many of our masajid and Islamic centers. When some people call at the Islamic Center and Masjid where I work, the first question they ask “do you speak Arabic.” My typical response to this question, “Yes I know Arabic but I would not speak with you in Arabic now.”
In the eyes of many Arabs, the status of non-Arabs in spiritual or religious matters is lower than them. This becomes apparent in the way they express their ideas and reactions to a non-Arabic speaking person.  
In the gulf, this phenomenon is even worst. Non-Arabs are looked down upon, especially, if they are from India, Pakistan or Bangladesh. However, they treat white folks as if they are their masters. In fact, in several Gulf countries, a semi-educated or ordinary clerical staff belonging to the white race earns a higher salary than a non-white non-Arab worker.   
It is humiliating to be in the company of these people. Many of them are self-righteous, arrogant and rude and insulting. In a gathering, an Arabic speaking individual once stood up to admonish the speaker to either speak Arabic or step down from the podium because Islam can only be explained in Arabic.
Both Arabs and South Asians have in general a negative attitude towards African-Americans. How many masajid invite African-American scholars or imams to give Friday sermons. Of course, exceptions are there, but that is due to the higher academic or religious excellence these people have achieved.
This attitude is not an attitude people are born with. None of us knows our lineage, race, color, language or even name when we are born. Someone tells us who we are and how should we view the other. Some of our very renowned scholars, unfortunately, have promoted racism, and culturally exclusive ideas in our Islamic vocabulary. It is shocking to see the name of very renowned scholars in this category.
A great majority of people from Arabic and non-Arabic speaking backgrounds does not believe in any of these racially motivated attitudes. It maintains a distance from such people. But, such people are often unaware of each other’s presence amongst them.
This is not going to last. As the knowledge of the Quran with translations would become common among non-Arabic speaking people, the notion of the superiority of Arabs over non-Arabs would be challenged and genuine Muslims would refer to the sayings of the Prophet that an Arab is not superior over an Ajami and an Ajami is not superior over Arabs. The honor belongs to the one who is closer to the divine teachings. The idol of racism will be crushed here in America because American is the only country in our recent history that crushed the notion of Jewish, Christian, white or black or Hispanic superiority. With the divine teachings on their side, Muslim people devoid of their racially motivated leaders can give a real Islamic identity to them and their coming generations.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

The History of the Preservation of the Quran

by Dr. Aslam Abdullah
Deen or what we loosely translate religion or faith is in the realm of divinely revealed knowledge. We don’t invent deen. We receive it. We believe that it is given to us by an authority, which is higher, objective and neutral. We believe that the higher authority chooses someone to receive the message through an angel. We use the terms Prophet (nabi) and the messenger (rasul) for the person chosen to deliver the divine message to humanity. The message itself confirms that it is not made up by human beings; rather, it is given by the Supreme Creator who has the interests of all in His mind, and who does not favor a race over the other or one ethnicity or culture over the other.
The deliverance of the divine message began with the advent of humanity. Some people followed it and others rejected it. Over a period of time, the divine message got corrupted and the original was lost. Thus the message was repeated through prophets and messengers from time to ensure that people never lose sight of the original. Thus, every Prophet and messenger repeated the same divine message that was revealed originally. The Creator did not confuse people in different ages with different messages. The language, the methodology, and the issues may have been different in the community of a new prophet depending on the nature of the human evolution, yet the message in its essence remained the same. 
What was revealed upon Prophet Muhammad is, in fact, a continuation and finalization of the divine message. Thus, the Quran was revealed at a time, when all other divine messages were either lost or got corrupted due to human interference. It is in this context that the Creator declared in the Quran that it is He who revealed it and it is He who would protect it. In other words, he would enable the prophet and the messenger to create conditions ensuring that not a single word of that divine message is lost.
If we are serious in our affirmation of the fact that God does exist and He guides humanity to a better path, then we must also admit that He would ensure they are preserved properly. He would not leave it a chance to get it compiled or preserved. Because one slight mistake in recording or preserving His words could be crucial. His majesty and organization are well displayed in everything that exists in the universe. Why would he leave His words unprotected and unorganized? If the previous messages were lost or forgotten, then, we have to assume that He did not plan their preservation. He wanted to preserve the message that he would repeat for the final time through a prophet in Arabia.
Only a prophet knew what was being revealed to him. No one other than a prophet could have experienced it and no one other than a messenger had the authority or the knowledge to decide what is revealed. While none of the previously revealed books were written or preserved during the lifetime of the Prophet who received it, the Quran became the first revealed book, which was written during the life of the prophet who had received it. It was verified, checked, approved and authenticated by him because he alone had the knowledge and authority to do so. (Look for the forthcoming article on the history of the preservation of religious scriptures of faiths other than Islam)
How did he do it?
The Quran and the books of ahadith (statements attributed to Prophet Muhammad) explain the process and the outcome. Even though there are some references in the books of ahadith that contradict the divine assertion about the preservation of the Quran, yet the overwhelming evidence clearly proves that the Quran that was revealed to the Prophet is the same that we read today. The presence of these traditions does not invalidate the authenticity of the Quran. Rather, they reveal their own weaknesses.
There are several anecdotes in our Islamic literature that challenge the claim that the Quran was compiled in the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad. For instance, we are told that the Quran was first compiled at the time of Abu Bakr, the first Caliph and then at the time of Uthman bin Affan, the third caliph under the supervision of a commission. The simple fact is that none other than the prophet had the knowledge of the Quran that came to him through direct sources and he was the only one to determine the accuracy of the divine revelation. A commission might have supervised the process of copying the Quran, but how could it have performed a task it was not qualified to do so. The prophet would not have left the compilation of the Quran on the basis of witnesses of other people. It was his duty and he fulfilled it with utmost responsibility.  It is an irony that in many of the Friday sermons, the name of Uthman bin Affan is mentioned as the compiler or collector of the Quran without realizing that it is the Prophet and not Uthman bin Affan who had the duty, authority and legitimacy to compile and collect the Quran. Those who say that the compilation of the Quran began at the suggestion of Umar, the second Caliph, they ignore the simple fact that it was God who had given His word for the protection of the Quran through His messenger, Prophet Muhammad. Those who say that the Prophet did not leave a completed written copy of the Quran before he left this world, have a very shortsighted understanding of the role of Prophethood.
We are also told that several verses of the Quran were not included in the Quran as they were lost. This is also an accusation and not fact because if the verses were lost and no one knew what those verses were, then how do we know about their existence. Moreover, if the Prophet did not include them in the Quran, then, who are we to question the decision of the Prophet about their inclusion or exclusion in the Quran. Hence, to say that parts of the Quran were lost is like accusing the Prophet of not doing his work properly. No one in his right mind can ever think that.
We are also told that certain verses of the Quran were abrogated by other verses of the Quran. Scholars differ in their identification of these verses. Some say they are 500 and others say they are five. There is no authentic hadith of the Prophet that clearly informs the believers what was canceled and what was not, especially, when there are verses in the Quran that emphatically state, Behold, it is We Ourselves who have bestowed from on high, step by step, this reminder? (15:9) And convey [to the world] whatever has been revealed to thee of thy Sustainer's writ. There is nothing that could alter His words; and thou canst find no refuge other than with Him (18:27) No scholar was given the authority to declare what is abrogated and what is not. (Look for a forthcoming article on abrogation.) The whole idea of abrogation of the verses of the Quran needs to be seen in the light of the divine message. When it comes to the Quran, we cannot just dismiss the divine statement as a mere play of words. Unfortunately, in the case of deciding the issue of abrogation, many of our Islam has twisted the words of the Quran to hide their own lack of understanding of the Quran.
We are also told that the written copies of the Quran in the personal use of many of the companions were different as some had more and some had fewer verses revealed upon the prophet. First of all, none of these copies are preserved and secondly whatever has been preserved does not have any contradictions thirdly, none of the companions of the Prophet who had these copies ever made the claim that they had the authentic copy of the Quran verified by the Prophet.
We are also told that since the Quran was not compiled in its final form, and the companions of the Prophet used to carry in a sack or bag the scattered ayas (verses) of the Quran written on stones, leaves, wood and hide. This suggests that even the surahs of the Quran were not put together at the time of the Prophet as the ayas were scattered. Unless a companion knew the Quran by heart, it was almost impossible for him to put all the scattered ayas in sequence. Even a hafiz would find it hard to put together over 6,000 scattered verses in the proper sequence if they are scattered. It is these kinds of traditions that promote the idea that preservation of the Quran the was not the priority of the one whose sole responsibility was to ensure that the Quran is transmitted to people fully and rightly. The Quran says addressing the Prophet: "Your duty is to convey the message." (3:20) When the prophet addressed over 100,000 people in his final Hajj sermon, one of the questions that he asked, "did I convey the message to you and each one of them responded, yes." He did not say part of the message or the message communicated verbally only.   
The authenticity of Islam depends on the accuracy of the Quran and the integrity of the Prophet. It rests on the assertion that it is the same as was revealed to Prophet Muhammad; and that he ensured that it was preserved forever through efforts that are well documented and well known. It also rests on the fact that nothing was added or removed from the Quran. Unfortunately, our Islamic literature has a lot that suggests that the Quran is not the same as we read today. (Look for the forthcoming article on stoning to death) 
Thus, loyalty to deen rests on the simple fact that whatever has been given to us in the name of deen is divine and the scripture is not contaminated with human ideas and thoughts.
Unfortunately, a good number of books written on the subject of the Quran probably, unconsciously, promote the idea that the Quran was not compiled in its current format in the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad under his supervision and guidance. The Quran refutes this and authenticates the integrity of the Prophet in preserving the final divine message. What an irony, that in terms of the history of the compilation of the Quran, many of our scholars and writers have given more credibility to history written some 300 years after the prophet than the Quran compiled and preserved in his lifetime.
The Quran was not for Arabs even though the language was Arabic and the prophet that delivered this message was from them. The guidance of the Quran was for all people and for all time. In other words, those who did not know the Arabic language were also the addressee of the Quran. (O Muhammad) tell them: “O mankind, I am the Messenger of Allah to all of you.” (7:158)  It was for the contemporaries of the Prophet as well as for those who would come after him. And beside them, even to others who have not yet joined them, Arabic speaking and non-Arabic speaking. “It means you are the Messenger to those who are to come after them.”(62:3) 
The Quran includes everything that was revealed to all previous messengers. “And We revealed to you this Book based on truth. It will validate in real earnest all the assertions made in the previously revealed books. And it has subsumed all the teachings of those Books.” (5: 48) 
The Quran introduces itself as “Allah’s guidance based on truth and justice have been set forth in this Book in a complete form. None has the authority to make any change in these laws (15:9).  The Prophet was asked to “Present to them whatever is revealed to you O Rasool, none shall change Allah’s words (18:27). Not a single word of the Quran has been changed since the time of its revelation. “There is no doubt that it is We, Ourselves, who have bestowed this Quran step by step and it is We who shall see that it is always preserved.” (15:9) There is nothing in the Quran that is contrary to the truth. “The untruth, the wrong, the falsehood from anywhere, neither from the front nor from the back of it will ever come by it.” (41: 42). 
Thus in our world today, the Quran is the only divinely revealed book that exists in its original form word by word, even though attempts have been made to prove that the book was not compiled in the lifetime of the Prophet. The following facts are proven by the Quran and the books of ahadith.
The Quran as we read today in Arabic is the same that was revealed to Prophet Muhammad.
The Prophet compiled it under his supervision as he was the only one who received the divine revelations.
There were several copies of the entire Quran available to companions during his lifetime.
The order of surah as we find in the Quran today is the same as it was at the time of the Prophet.
There were scores of companions both men and women of the Prophet who had memorized the entire Quran under his guidance.
The Quran was the only source that the Prophet used to educate people about Allah’s guidance. 
The Quran that we read today is the same that was read by people who followed him and the succeeding generations after them. They transmitted it through the written word as well as orally. There were no differences in pronunciations of the Quran.
The Prophet ensured that every revelation is preserved in the writing as well as memory as he was fully aware of the changed people had brought in their scriptures.

The practice of writing at the time of the Prophet
The practice of writing and reading was common among the people of Arabia at the time of the Prophet. The Quran exhorts the people: “Whenever you enter into the matter pertaining to the giving of loans for a particular period, do commit it to writing.” (2: 284) The Quran explains that writing establishes the evidence. (2:282) Thus the Quran asserts: “(This revelation) is preserved in such scrolls, which are the most respect-worthy, the most exalted, the most cleansed, are of the highest grandeur, free of every inkling of any error, of any human inclination – pristine sacred. It is written by the calligraphers, who are held of high esteem and exalted prestige in the society.” (80: 13-16) 
The Quran even mentions that: It is a written Book on the spread-out parchment, (52: 2-3) or “It is the most esteemed the noblest, Quran, preserved and conserved in the form of a Book.” (56: 77-78).  There were at least 41 companions of the Prophet whose names we know who knew how to write and read. They included:
Handhala bin Rabee, Umr bin Rafey, Rafey bin Malik, Saad bin Ibadah, Usaid bin Hadheer, Munzir bin Rawah, Saad bin Ar Rabee, Abu Abas bin Jabar, Abdur Rehman, Abu Yunus Maula Ayesha, Abdur Rehman bin Hur bin Umr bin Zaid, Abdullah bin Saeed bin al Aas, Zaid bin Thabit, Abdullah bin Saad bin Abi Sarh, Abu Bakr, Umr, Uthman, Ali, Zubair bin Awwam, Khalid bin Saeed bin al Aas, Aban, Saad bin al-Aas, Handhala al Asadi, ala bin al-Hadhrami, Khalid bin Waleed, Muhammad bin Salma, Abdullah bin Abdullah bin Abi Salool, Mughera bin Shaba, Umr bin al Aas, Muawaiya bin Abi Sufiyan, Jaheem bin as Sulat, Muaqeeb bin Fatima, Abdullah bin Arqam and Sharjeel bin Hasana.
The tradition of writing was present among Arabs when the Prophet began his mission. He patronized it and improved it. For example during the battle of the Badr, 70 members of the Makkan army were taken, prisoners. Those who were unable to pay for their freedom were asked to teach at least 10 youth of Madina how to read and write. When these young people excelled in the art of reading and writing, the prisoners were released. (Tabaqat ibn Saad, Volume II, P 14)
In Medina, one of the first tasks that the Prophet assigned to Abdullah bin Saeed was to teach the people of Medina how to read and write.
It is said that Yahya Bermaki was the first one who introduced paper for writing among Arabs. (Muqaddama Ibn Khaldun) Some people suggest that it was Hujjaj bin Yusuf who introduced it first. It is also said that the Khurasan paper was manufactured with cotton during the time of Bani Ummayad, Many historians assert that it predates Ummayad period as a Chinese first introduced it in Khurasan (Sanajat-u-Tarb)
In his book Miftahul Afkar, the author records some 36 letters that were written at the instance of the Prophet to different tribes and rulers. The treaty of Hudaibiya was also written down. The famous Muallaqat is known as Saba Muallaqat and they were placed on the door of the Kaaba in writing during the Prophet’s time in Makkah.
There were two popular methods used during that time to put things in writing. People used to write on thin parchments prepared from the hides of animals and this was known as Riq. The Quran also uses this word. There was also something called Mehriq. In Lisan ul Arab, Mehriq is defined as a very fine thin hide that was produced for the purpose of writing. The Quran also uses the word Qirtas as a material used for writing. If We had sent unto thee a written (message) on parchment, so that they could touch it with their hands, the Unbelievers would have been sure to say: "This is nothing but obvious magic!" (6:7)
For, no true understanding of God have they when they say, "Never has God revealed anything unto man." Say: "Who has bestowed from on high the divine writ which Moses brought unto men as a light and guidance, [and] which you treat as [mere] leaves of paper, making a show of them the while you conceal [so] much - although you have been taught [by it] what neither you nor your forefathers had ever known?" Say: "God [has revealed that divine writ]!" - and then leave them to play at their vain talk. (6:91)
This means that the paper was in use at the time of the revelation and Allah used the word to emphasize the importance of writings.
The prophet was very particular about the availability of the means of writing to him. This was to ensure that the message of Allah can be written down instantly. For instance, during the journey to Medina, the migrating caravan carried pen, inkpot, and paper. The letter written to Suraqa, the one who was chasing him during the journey provides evidence to this fact.
Thus it is evident that at the time of the Prophet a large number of Muslims knew how to read and write. The material for writing was easily available and the community of believers under the leadership of the Prophet was aware of preserving the divine revelations in writing. The Prophet would instantly ask the available scribers to write down the revelation and would also teach the believers to memorize the portion.
Motivation to learn the Quran
The Quran was the text the prophet used to teach Allah’s revelation to people. “The best among you is the one who learns the Quran and teaches it.” (Uthman bin Affan in Bukhari)
“The one who reads the Quran is like a fruit that tastes good and whose smell is also good and the one who does not read it is like the date that is good but that does not have a good smell. (Abu Musa in Bukhari)
“On the Day of Judgment, the reciters of the Quran would be asked to read the Quran the way they used to recite in the world and climb up and wherever their recitation completes, that place would become their home.” (Abdullah ibn Umar in Ahmed, Tirmidhi, Abu Dawood, and Nasai)
The prophet said that he was commanded to sit in the company of those who recite the Quran. (Abu Saeed in Abu Dawood)
Uthman bin Abi al Aas reported that as part of the delegation of Bani Thaqif, I came to the Prophet and he taught me the Quran. (Tabaqat ibn Saad, Volume VII), page 27)
Ibn Masood reported that we used to learn ten ayas (verses) from the Prophet in one lesson and after we had memorized it we would learn the next 10. (Bukhari)
Abu Darda reported that he personally read the entire Quran from the Prophet. (Bukhari)
It is reported that the Prophet asked the people to learn the Quran from Ibn Masood, Salim Maula Abu Hudhaifa, Abi ibn Kaab, and Maaz. (Bukhari)
Ubadah bin as Samit reported that whenever any would migrate to Medina, the Prophet would connect him with one of his companions so that he could learn the Quran.
During the 10 Hijri Ramadan, 10 people from the tribe of Aamir accepted Islam and as long as they remained in Medina, they learned the Quran from Ubai ibn Kaab (Muqaddamma ibn Khaldun)
The same year, people from the tribe of Bani Hanifa accepted Islam and they also learned the Quran from Ubai ibn Kaab.
It is reported that Khubab ibn al-Arat used to teach the Quran to the sister of Umar bin Khattab and her husband on a regular basis from the written material.
During the eighth century when Makka came under the supervision of Islam, the Prophet asked Maaz bin Jabal to teach the Quran to the people. In the 10th Hijra Maaz was sent to Yemen to start giving mass education of the Quran, When the people of Daqa and Adhal accepted Islam, the Prophet sent Marthad, Aasim, Khubaib, Khalid bin Bakr, Zaid bin Dathna and Abdullah bin Tariq to teach them the Quran.
Whenever any tribe would come to Medina to accept Islam, the Prophet would appoint a companion to teach them the Quran as well as instruct some to accompany the tribe back to their place to help them acquire the knowledge of the divine revelations.
During the fourth Hijra when one of the tribal leaders of Najad came to Medina, he requested for Quran teachers for his people. Some 70 teachers of the Quran were sent with him. If the number of instructors exceeded 70 in the initial stages of the Hijra, one does not have to guess about the importance of learning and teaching the Quran during the lifetime of the Prophet.
Thus the spirit of learning and teaching the Quran was a norm of the time. Everyone knew a part or full of what was revealed until then. The Quran was the textbook, the Quran was the curriculum and the Quran was the applied science of the time.
The Writing of the Quran
There were several companions of the Prophet who knew how to read and write. Among them were Abu Abas bin Heer, Ubai bin Kaab, Saad bin Rabee, Shahur bin Saeed, Awus in Zaid, Awus bin Khauli, al-Muzir bin Umr, Usaid bin Hudhair, Saad bin Ubadah, Rafey bin Malik, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman and Ali and many others.
Ibn Abdul Bir mentions the name of at least 24 companions who were always available to put words in writing for the Prophet. Among them were Ubai bin Kaab, Zaid bin Thabit, Abdullah bin Saad, Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Ali, Zubair bin Awwam, Khalid, Aban, Saeed, Handhala, Alaa, Khalid bin Waleed, Abdullah bin Rawah, Muhammad bin Muslamah, Abdullah bin Abdullah bin Salool, Mughaira bin Shuaba, Umr bin Aas, Muwaiya bin Sufiyan, Hajam bin as Sult, Muaqeeb bin Fatima, Sharjeel bin Hasana, Abdullah bin Arqam. .
Thus the Quran not only was in the memory of hundreds of companions, male and female but also in writing form at the time of the Prophet. The Quran was memorized by hundreds of the companions of the Prophet. “These are the lucid verses, (preserved) in the hearts of the people who have been bestowed with the knowledge of (Wahi).” (29: 49).
There was a Master Copy of the Quran. It was always kept in a box near the pillar of the pulpit at Prophet’s Mosque. It was exactly the same copy which the Messenger of Allah used to ask the calligraphers to write the revealed verses.  This copy was called Imam or Umm in their own dialect, and the pillar with which this copy was placed was called “Astawaana Mashaf”. Sitting by this pillar, the companions, under the supervision of the Messenger, used to make copies.
Professor Hamidullah, a noted Islamic scholar of the last century writes: “The sources all agree in stating that whenever a fragment of the Qur’an was revealed, the Prophet called one of his literate companions and dictated it to him. The Prophet Muhammad also recommended that the faithful learn the Quran by heart. The method of doubly preserving the text both in writing and by memorization proved to be extremely precious.” 
From this copy, several copies were made and distributed in all parts of the Muslim world. Abu Bakr ® the first Caliph of Islam, asked Prophet Muhammad’s main scribe, Zaid Ibn Thabit, to make copies of the Quran. Caliph Omar bin Khattab (R), subsequently made a single volume (mushaf) that he preserved and gave on his death to his daughter Hafsa, the Prophets’ widow.”
Imam ibn Hazm has noted down in his book Kitab al Fisl: “During the period of the first caliph, there was no city where the inhabitants had not had a number of personal copies of the Quran. And during the period of Caliph Omer (R) the number of written copies of this majestic Book, the Quran, was not less than one hundred thousand.  
The third Caliph Uthman bin Affan asked a commission to prepare seven or eight copies of the Quran from the master copy. One of his authentic copies was kept in Madina. A 3rd-century researcher, Abu Ubaida Al-Qasim bin Salaam (d. 223 H.) in his Kitaab-ul-Qiraat claims to have seen that copy of the Quran. Ibn Batuta, a Muslim traveler says that one Abu Bakr al Shaashi had placed it on the shrine of Abdullah. When the Belorussian Soviet Socialist Republic was established this very copy of the Quran came to the Balschiwk’s hands. The information regarding this copy published in a Soviet Journal (Soviet Vase) in 1995 indicated that this very copy of Uthmaan (Mashaf-i-Usmaani) was in Timur’s library, which was established in 1393 AD.  After the Russian Revolution in 1917 AD, this copy of the Quran, reached Ufa through the courtesy of a meeting of the Muslim representatives of the Russian Parliament. Then it was brought to Tashkent.  (Source: Abu Mahfooz-ul-Karim Masoomi: Mashafey Usmaan key T’areekhi Nuskhey (The historical copies of the Quran of Mashaf-I-Usmaan) published in the Journal of Uloom-I-Qslamia, December 1961 printed and published by Aligarh University) 
Fakhry Pasha, the governor of Turkey, along with other sacred documents took this copy to Constantinople and now it is there.  Shibly Nomani, noted biographer of the Prophet in his writing is said to have seen a copy of the original Quran in the Damascus University in 1896. One copy of the Quran is in Paas; another copy is in the library of Khadairya (Egypt). Several copies of the Quran written by the companions of the Messenger are found in the various libraries and museums of India, Iran, Egypt, Arabia, and Turkey. 
In Istanbul Library there are copies Quran written by Uthman bin Affan (R), Ali bin Abi Talib (R) wrote in his own hand writing and this copy is in Istanbul. Other handwritten copies of the Quran including the one by Zain ul Aabedeen and Zaid bin Thabit, Usmaan, Hasan bin Ali, and Sajjad are found in the museum-archeological section of Iran. Maurice Bucaille, in his book The Bible, The Qur’an and Science writes that: “ It (The Quran) was written down at the time of the Prophet (p.126); The Qur’an (is) a book of written Revelation (p.127); As the Revelation progressed, the Prophet and the believers following him recited the text by heart and it was also written down by the scribes in his following (p.127); Long before the Prophet left Makka for Madina the Quranic text so far revealed had been written down (p.128); The Quran itself, therefore, provides indications as to the fact that it was set down in writing at the time of the Prophet. It is a known fact that there were several scribes in his following, the most famous of whom, Zaid Ibn Thabit has left his name to posterity (p.129).” 
Thus, the fact is well established that the Quran was preserved in writing in its complete form, the same form that we have today at the time of the Prophet.